CaRMS taxon details
Cylindroleberis Brady, 1867
146869 (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:146869)
accepted
Genus
Asterope Philippi, 1840 · unaccepted (Preoccupied)
Asteropina Strand, 1928 · unaccepted (Unecessary replacement name...)
Unecessary replacement name (Brady, 1868 had already proposed Cylindroleberis for Asterope Philippi, 1840)
marine, fresh, terrestrial
recent only
Brady, G. S. (1868). A synopsis of the recent British Ostracoda. <em>The Intellectual Observer.</em> 12: 110-130. [details] 
Status This note was kindly assembled by Gary Poore: Asterope Philippi, 1840 was replaced by Cylindroleberis Brady, 1868: 127...
Status This note was kindly assembled by Gary Poore: Asterope Philippi, 1840 was replaced by Cylindroleberis Brady, 1868: 127 [because Asterope was preoccupied] and Asteropina Strand, 1928 is an unneccessary replacement name for preoccupied Asterope (Gary Poore, personal communication). The type species of Asterope (and consequently of Cylindroleberis) is Asterope elliptica Philippi, 1840 accepted as Cylindroleberis elliptica (Philippi, 1840). Cylindroleberis is a replacement name for Asterope Philippi, 1840. As such it does not have a type species of its own but assumes that of Asterope. This issue is covered by ICZN Article 67.8.
Asterope was described with only one species, Asterope elliptica Philppi, 1840, its type species by monotypy.
Sylvester-Bradley’s (1961) designation of Asterope mariae as type species of Cylindroleberis was both wrong (replacement names don’t have type species) and unnecessary (Asterope already has a type species).
In WoRMS the type species should be attached to Asterope, even though it is an unaccepted name (junior homonym), not to Cylindroleberis (replacement name). ICZN Recommendation 67B advises that type species should be cited in its original combination. [details]
Asterope was described with only one species, Asterope elliptica Philppi, 1840, its type species by monotypy.
Sylvester-Bradley’s (1961) designation of Asterope mariae as type species of Cylindroleberis was both wrong (replacement names don’t have type species) and unnecessary (Asterope already has a type species).
In WoRMS the type species should be attached to Asterope, even though it is an unaccepted name (junior homonym), not to Cylindroleberis (replacement name). ICZN Recommendation 67B advises that type species should be cited in its original combination. [details]
Brandão, S.N.; Antonietto, L.S; Nery, D.G.; Pereira, J.S.; Praxedes, R.A.; Santos, S.G.; Karanovic, I. (2024). World Ostracoda Database. Cylindroleberis Brady, 1867. Accessed through: Nozères, C., Kennedy, M.K. (Eds.) (2024) Canadian Register of Marine Species at: https://www.marinespecies.org/carms/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=146869 on 2024-05-09
Nozères, C., Kennedy, M.K. (Eds.) (2024). Canadian Register of Marine Species. Cylindroleberis Brady, 1867. Accessed at: https://marinespecies.org/CaRMS/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=146869 on 2024-05-09
Date
action
by
2006-09-11 06:44:08Z
changed
Martinez, Olga
original description
Brady, G. S. (1868). A synopsis of the recent British Ostracoda. <em>The Intellectual Observer.</em> 12: 110-130. [details]
original description (of Asterope Philippi, 1840) Philippi, A. (1840). Zoologische Bemerkungen (Fortsetzung). <em>Archiv für Naturgeschichte.</em> 6(1): 181-195, pls. 3-4., available online at https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/7203160 [details]
basis of record Kornicker, L. S. (1992). Myodocopid Ostracoda of the Benthédi Expedition, 1977, to the NE Mozambique Channel, Indian Ocean. <em>Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology.</em> 530-537. [details] Available for editors
additional source Neave, Sheffield Airey. (1939-1996). Nomenclator Zoologicus vol. 1-10 Online. <em>[Online Nomenclator Zoologicus at Checklistbank. Ubio link has gone].</em> , available online at https://www.checklistbank.org/dataset/126539/about [details]
redescription Syme, A.E., Poore, G.C.B., (2008a). A supplementary description of Cypridina mariae and rediagnosis of the genus Cylindroleberis (Ostracoda: Myodocopa: Cylindroleberididae). PLoS One 3, e1960. [details]
original description (of Asterope Philippi, 1840) Philippi, A. (1840). Zoologische Bemerkungen (Fortsetzung). <em>Archiv für Naturgeschichte.</em> 6(1): 181-195, pls. 3-4., available online at https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/7203160 [details]
basis of record Kornicker, L. S. (1992). Myodocopid Ostracoda of the Benthédi Expedition, 1977, to the NE Mozambique Channel, Indian Ocean. <em>Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology.</em> 530-537. [details] Available for editors
additional source Neave, Sheffield Airey. (1939-1996). Nomenclator Zoologicus vol. 1-10 Online. <em>[Online Nomenclator Zoologicus at Checklistbank. Ubio link has gone].</em> , available online at https://www.checklistbank.org/dataset/126539/about [details]
redescription Syme, A.E., Poore, G.C.B., (2008a). A supplementary description of Cypridina mariae and rediagnosis of the genus Cylindroleberis (Ostracoda: Myodocopa: Cylindroleberididae). PLoS One 3, e1960. [details]
Present Inaccurate Introduced: alien Containing type locality
From editor or global species database
Status This note was kindly assembled by Gary Poore: Asterope Philippi, 1840 was replaced by Cylindroleberis Brady, 1868: 127 [because Asterope was preoccupied] and Asteropina Strand, 1928 is an unneccessary replacement name for preoccupied Asterope (Gary Poore, personal communication). The type species of Asterope (and consequently of Cylindroleberis) is Asterope elliptica Philippi, 1840 accepted as Cylindroleberis elliptica (Philippi, 1840). Cylindroleberis is a replacement name for Asterope Philippi, 1840. As such it does not have a type species of its own but assumes that of Asterope. This issue is covered by ICZN Article 67.8.Asterope was described with only one species, Asterope elliptica Philppi, 1840, its type species by monotypy.
Sylvester-Bradley’s (1961) designation of Asterope mariae as type species of Cylindroleberis was both wrong (replacement names don’t have type species) and unnecessary (Asterope already has a type species).
In WoRMS the type species should be attached to Asterope, even though it is an unaccepted name (junior homonym), not to Cylindroleberis (replacement name). ICZN Recommendation 67B advises that type species should be cited in its original combination. [details]
