WoRMS name details
Aenone Lamarck, 1818
1462267 (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:1462267)
unaccepted > nomen nudum (printer error for intended Oenone)
Genus
marine, fresh
recent only
Lamarck, [J.-B. M.] de. (1818). <i>Histoire naturelle des animaux sans vertèbres</i>. Tome cinquième, 612 pp. Paris, Deterville/Verdière. , available online at http://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/12886879
page(s): 321; note: Aenone is printed instead of the intended Oenone. No description, therefore a nomen nudum [details]
page(s): 321; note: Aenone is printed instead of the intended Oenone. No description, therefore a nomen nudum [details]
Nomenclature Aenone is printed instead of the intended Oenone used later. No description, therefore a nomen nudum, Risso makes Aenone...
Nomenclature Aenone is printed instead of the intended Oenone used later. No description, therefore a nomen nudum, Risso makes Aenone available in 1826 when describing Aenone lithophaga, presumably also erroneously using Lamarck's misspelling. [details]
Read, G.; Fauchald, K. (Ed.) (2025). World Polychaeta Database. Aenone Lamarck, 1818. Accessed through: World Register of Marine Species at: https://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=1462267 on 2025-09-13
Date
action
by
The webpage text is licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution 4.0 License
Nomenclature
original description
Lamarck, [J.-B. M.] de. (1818). <i>Histoire naturelle des animaux sans vertèbres</i>. Tome cinquième, 612 pp. Paris, Deterville/Verdière. , available online at http://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/12886879
page(s): 321; note: Aenone is printed instead of the intended Oenone. No description, therefore a nomen nudum [details]
page(s): 321; note: Aenone is printed instead of the intended Oenone. No description, therefore a nomen nudum [details]
From editor or global species database
Nomenclature Aenone is printed instead of the intended Oenone used later. No description, therefore a nomen nudum, Risso makes Aenone available in 1826 when describing Aenone lithophaga, presumably also erroneously using Lamarck's misspelling. [details]
