WoRMS taxon details
Hymenodiscus membranacea (Sladen, 1889)
381776 (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:381776)
accepted
Species
Brisinga membranacea Sladen, 1889 · unaccepted
Brisingella membranacea (Sladen, 1889) · unaccepted
marine, brackish, fresh, terrestrial
recent only
(of Brisinga membranacea Sladen, 1889) Sladen, W.P. (1889). Report on the Asteroidea. <em>Report on the Scientific Results of the Voyage of H.M.S. Challenger during the years 1873–1876. Zoology.</em> 30 (part 51): xlii + 893 pages, 118 plates., available online at http://www.19thcenturyscience.org/HMSC/HMSC-Reports/Zool-51/README.htm
page(s): 611 [details]
page(s): 611 [details]
Status Fisher (1928) tentatively referred this species and B. membranacea to Brisingella (now Hymenodiscus). However, only...
Status Fisher (1928) tentatively referred this species and B. membranacea to Brisingella (now Hymenodiscus). However, only detatched arms of this species are known and an unambiguous placement into any genus seems unlikely pending collection and examination of less damaged material. It also seems unlikelly that species based on such limited material will remain valid after more material is studied. [details]
Mah, C.L. (2024). World Asteroidea Database. Hymenodiscus membranacea (Sladen, 1889). Accessed through: World Register of Marine Species at: https://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=381776 on 2024-10-30
Date
action
by
The webpage text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License
original description
(of Brisinga membranacea Sladen, 1889) Sladen, W.P. (1889). Report on the Asteroidea. <em>Report on the Scientific Results of the Voyage of H.M.S. Challenger during the years 1873–1876. Zoology.</em> 30 (part 51): xlii + 893 pages, 118 plates., available online at http://www.19thcenturyscience.org/HMSC/HMSC-Reports/Zool-51/README.htm
page(s): 611 [details]
page(s): 611 [details]
From editor or global species database
Status Fisher (1928) tentatively referred this species and B. membranacea to Brisingella (now Hymenodiscus). However, only detatched arms of this species are known and an unambiguous placement into any genus seems unlikely pending collection and examination of less damaged material. It also seems unlikelly that species based on such limited material will remain valid after more material is studied. [details]
