WoRMS taxon details

Exogonoides antennata Day, 1963

328002  (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:328002)

accepted
Species
marine, brackish, fresh, terrestrial
recent only
Day, John H. (1963). The polychaete fauna of South Africa. Part 8: New species and records from grab samples and dredgings. <em>Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History), Series Zoology.</em> 10(7): 381-445., available online at https://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/2253177
page(s): 403-404, fig. 5j-n [details]  Available for editors  PDF available [request] 
Holotype  NHMUK 1963.1.34, geounit South African part...  
Holotype NHMUK 1963.1.34, geounit South African part of the Indian Ocean [details]
Note Off the south coast of the Cape Province,...  
From editor or global species database
Type locality Off the south coast of the Cape Province, South Africa, Indian Ocean (34º02'S, 23º28.4'E; -34.0333, 23.4733), in 49 m on sand, mud and rock. [details]
Type material According to Aguado & San Martín (2008: 54) the holotype (BM 1963.1.34) and the paratype (BM 1963.1.35) could represent two fragments of the same specimen, with the holotype being the anterior fragment and the paratype the posterior one. According to the same authors, the segment at which the holotype is fragmented coincides with the first segment of the paratype. [details]
Depth range 49 m.   
Depth range 49 m.  [details]

Distribution South Africa, off the south coast of Cape Province (Indian Ocean).   
Distribution South Africa, off the south coast of Cape Province (Indian Ocean).  [details]

Etymology The specific epithet refers to the shape of the antennae of the species, short and ovoid, projecting forward from the...  
Etymology The specific epithet refers to the shape of the antennae of the species, short and ovoid, projecting forward from the anterior end of the prostomium.  [details]
Read, G.; Fauchald, K. (Ed.) (2019). World Polychaeta database. Exogonoides antennata Day, 1963. Accessed through: World Register of Marine Species at: http://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=328002 on 2019-08-20
Date
action
by
2008-03-17 10:44:16Z
created
2008-03-26 11:36:43Z
changed

Creative Commons License The webpage text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License


original description Day, John H. (1963). The polychaete fauna of South Africa. Part 8: New species and records from grab samples and dredgings. <em>Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History), Series Zoology.</em> 10(7): 381-445., available online at https://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/2253177
page(s): 403-404, fig. 5j-n [details]  Available for editors  PDF available [request] 

additional source Liu J.Y. [Ruiyu] (ed.). (2008). Checklist of marine biota of China seas. <em>China Science Press.</em> 1267 pp. (look up in IMIS[details]  Available for editors  PDF available [request] 

redescription Aguado, M.T.; San Martín, G. (2008). Re-description of some enigmatic genera of Syllidae (Phyllodocida: Polychaeta). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom. 88(01): 35-56., available online at http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S002531540800026X
page(s): 52-54, fig. 11 [details]   
 
 Present  Inaccurate  Introduced: alien  Containing type locality 
Holotype NHMUK 1963.1.34, geounit South African part of the Indian Ocean [details]
Paratype NHMUK 1963.1.35, geounit South African part of the Indian Ocean [details]
From editor or global species database
Depth range 49 m.  [details]

Distribution South Africa, off the south coast of Cape Province (Indian Ocean).  [details]

Etymology The specific epithet refers to the shape of the antennae of the species, short and ovoid, projecting forward from the anterior end of the prostomium.  [details]

Habitat On sand, mud and rock. [details]

Type locality Off the south coast of the Cape Province, South Africa, Indian Ocean (34º02'S, 23º28.4'E; -34.0333, 23.4733), in 49 m on sand, mud and rock. [details]

Type material According to Aguado & San Martín (2008: 54) the holotype (BM 1963.1.34) and the paratype (BM 1963.1.35) could represent two fragments of the same specimen, with the holotype being the anterior fragment and the paratype the posterior one. According to the same authors, the segment at which the holotype is fragmented coincides with the first segment of the paratype. [details]