WoRMS name details

Procyttarium Haeckel, 1879

1710568  (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:1710568)

uncertain > unassessed
Genus

Ordering

  • Alphabetically
  • By status

Children Display

  1. Species Procyttarium primordiale Haeckel, 1879 (uncertain > unassessed, most likely a morphotype rather than an actual biological taxon)
  2. Species Procyttarium prototypus Haeckel, 1887 (uncertain > unassessed, most likely a morphotype rather than an actual biological taxon)
marine, fresh, terrestrial
Haeckel, E. (1879). Naturliche Schopfungsgeschichte. G. Reimer, Berlin. 1-718. [details]   
Taxonomic remark Actissa and its several subgenera such as Procyttarium - all from Haeckel - do not appear to have any biologic validity...  
Taxonomic remark Actissa and its several subgenera such as Procyttarium - all from Haeckel - do not appear to have any biologic validity based on the molecular results of Biard et al. 2015. It is even unclear if the species themselves have any biologic meaning. Actissa is far more commonly used than Procyttarium for species in this group in the literature from Haeckel to modern times. [details]
WoRMS (2024). Procyttarium Haeckel, 1879. Accessed at: https://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=1710568 on 2024-05-14
Date
action
by
2023-10-11 10:03:50Z
created

Creative Commons License The webpage text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License


original description Haeckel, E. (1879). Naturliche Schopfungsgeschichte. G. Reimer, Berlin. 1-718. [details]   

basis of record Rees, T. (compiler) . (2024). The Interim Register of Marine and Nonmarine Genera. Available from https://www.irmng.org at VLIZ. Accessed YYYY-MM-DD., available online at https://www.irmng.org [details]   

additional source Biard, T.; Pillet, L.; Decelle, J.; Poirier, C.; Suzuki, N.; Not, F. (2015). Towards an Integrative Morpho-molecular Classification of the Collodaria (Polycystinea, Radiolaria). <em>Protist.</em> 166(3): 374-388., available online at https://hdl.handle.net/10.1016/j.protis.2015.05.002 [details]  Available for editors  PDF available [request] 
From editor or global species database
Taxonomic remark Actissa and its several subgenera such as Procyttarium - all from Haeckel - do not appear to have any biologic validity based on the molecular results of Biard et al. 2015. It is even unclear if the species themselves have any biologic meaning. Actissa is far more commonly used than Procyttarium for species in this group in the literature from Haeckel to modern times. [details]