WoRMS source details

Razouls, C., N. Desreumaux, J. Kouwenberg & F. de Bovée. (2005). Biodiversity of Marine Planktonic Copepods (morphology, geographical distribution and biological data). Sorbonne University, CNRS.
176275
Razouls, C., N. Desreumaux, J. Kouwenberg & F. de Bovée
2005
Biodiversity of Marine Planktonic Copepods (morphology, geographical distribution and biological data).
Sorbonne University, CNRS
Database
The result is a site, unique in the world for marine planktonic copepods, and created at the Oceanological Observatory of Banyuls sur Mer. It is the fruit of more than 50 years of researches coordinated by Claude Razouls and of multiple collaborations at the international level. It presents a complete interactive database of all described marine planktonic copepods, including : Taxonomic classification with referencesIllustrated and referenced species database A geographic distribution in the world's oceans and seas, with division in zones and subzones A complete bibliography including taxonomic and ecological aspects The database was compiled from a bibliographic search of 9900 relevant scientific publications, taking into account the actual state of synonymy. It comprises 342 genera, and 2694 studied species with their geographic distribution. The species cards are progressively enriched with elements such as figure plates, maps, graphs or charts, favouring the rare documents. Currently, 20435 elements have been included, see the example figure opposite.
RIS (EndNote, Reference Manager, ProCite, RefWorks)
BibTex (BibDesk, LaTeX)
Date
action
by
2014-04-03 09:41:42Z
created
2022-09-13 12:11:04Z
changed
2023-04-03 13:43:15Z
changed
2023-04-05 12:31:59Z
changed









































































































































































































 Classification

According to Ferrari & Markhaseva (2000, p.1084-1087) the decision to place this species within the ... [details]

 Classification

Perhaps in the Genus Scaphocalanus or Lophothrix. [details]

 Dispersal

Transport to Chili and California (San Francisco) without doubt in ship's ballast (Hirakawa, 1988, p.357), like in ... [details]

 Dispersal

Introduced into San Francisco waters by means of ships' ballast. [details]

 Distribution

The forms reported from the Atlantic could be confused with T. meteorae [details]

 Environment

In mangroves and estuaries [details]

 Identification

Confounded before 2006 with Acartia pacifica [details]

 Identification

Confounded before 2006 with Acartia othsukai [details]

 Identification

IMPOSSIBLE TO IDENTIFY THIS SPECIES: ref. Brady, 1883 (p.74); Giesbrecht & Schmeil, 1898 (p.157) [details]

 Identification

IMPOSSIBLE TO IDENTIFY: ref. Giesbrecht & Schmeil, 1898 (p.157) [details]

 Synonymy

A possible synonym of Acartia (Odontacartia) lilljeborgi Giesbrecht, 1889 [details]

 Synonymy

Cf. ? Eurytemora velox , or maintained. Incomplete data. [details]

 Synonymy

REFS: McMurrich, 1917 (p.47, fig.M); Fontaine, 1955 (p.890); Shih & al., 1971 (p.57, 215); Isaac, 1975 (p.6, 8, ... [details]

 Synonymy

Probable in the G. Scolecithricella. Cf. Scolecithricella ovata [details]

 Synonymy

The male of Spinocalanus pseudospinipes has been maintained. [details]

 Taxonomic remark

For Soh & al. (2013, p.723) this species closely resembles A. southwelli and A. sarojus, but it differs from the ... [details]

 Taxonomic remark

After Rose (1943, p.153) this male could be perhaps the male of Pachos tuberosum [details]

 Taxonomic remark

The change of the genus does not seem to be entirely ensured.  [details]

 Taxonomic remark

This atypical form, which presents rudimentary mouthparts, was never re-encountered and could correspond to a ... [details]

 Taxonomic remark

According to Bradford & al.(1983) it could be a juvenile M. This species has not been encountered since its ... [details]

 Taxonomy

After Huys & Conroy-Dalton (2000, p.29), Poppe (1891) distinguished this variety from the Java Sea on the basis of ... [details]

 Taxonomy

Described as Haemocera danae Malaquin,1901. Sars (1921, p.9) considers this genus as a synonym of Cymbasoma. Isaac ... [details]

 Taxonomy

Fleminger, 1967 a (p.XII: tabl.1) considers this species as a junior synonym of Epilabidocera longipedata. [details]

 Validity

Doubtful species [details]

 Validity

According to Vives & Shmeleva (2007) this species is valid, the difference with A. margalefi leans upon the form of ... [details]

 Validity

Doubtful species. Thompson (1900 c, p.284) supposes this form a synonym of A. erythraea considering its original ... [details]

 Validity

?NO REF., ?NO LOCALITY [details]

 Validity

DOUBTFUL SPECIES! Has not been encountered since its description. [details]

 Validity

Possible synonym of Pseudotharybis magnus?  [details]

 Validity

? Cf. C. simillimus or Calanus propinquus [details]

 Validity

SYN. of Corycaeus (Ditrichocorycaeus) subulatus, see: M.S. Wilson, 1949 (p.321, figs.F,M); Grice, 1956 (p.55); ... [details]

 Validity

Impossible to identify. Based on immature stage. See: Giesbrecht, 1892 (p.446); Giesbrecht & Schmeil, 1898 (p.138); ... [details]

 Validity

Doubtful species. [details]

 Validity

Doubtful species. Cf. Parvocalanus scotti or Paracalanus denudatus [details]

 Validity

Male is probably syn. of Paraeuchaeta russeli and female Euchaeta marina. [details]

 Validity

Juvenile form. CF? [details]

 Validity

Doubtful species. See: Jespersen, 1934 (p.69, Descr.F, figs.F); Sewell, 1948 (p.486, 493); Vinogradov, 1958 (1970) ... [details]

 Validity

DOUBTFUL SPECIES [details]

 Validity

DOUBTFUL SPECIES, JUVENILE FORM? [details]