WoRMS source details
Kobayashi, Genki; Miura, Tomoyuki; Kojima, Shigeaki. (2015). Lamellibrachia sagami sp. nov., a new vestimentiferan tubeworm (Annelida: Siboglinidae) from Sagami Bay and several sites in the northwestern Pacific Ocean. Zootaxa. 4018(1): 97-108.
200518
10.11646/zootaxa.4018.1.5 [view]
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:E2200628-74FE-4454-9FF9-6DEEA422EDFF [view]
Kobayashi, Genki; Miura, Tomoyuki; Kojima, Shigeaki
2015
<em>Lamellibrachia </em><em>sagami </em>sp. nov., a new vestimentiferan tubeworm (Annelida: Siboglinidae) from Sagami Bay and several sites in the northwestern Pacific Ocean
Zootaxa
4018(1): 97-108
Publication
World Polychaeta Database (WPolyDb). Article is open access
A new vestimentiferan tubeworm species of the genus Lamellibrachia Webb, 1969 is described. It was collected from cold seep areas off Hatsushima in Sagami Bay and at the Daini Tenryu Knoll in the Nankai Trough (606–1170 m depth). Lamellibrachia sagami sp. nov. differs from seven congeneric species in the following character states; showing a wider range of diameter of vestimental and trunk plaques than L. barhami, L. luymesi, L. satsuma and L. anaximandri; and having more numerous sheath lamellae (3–6 pairs) than L. juni (2–3 pairs) but fewer than L. victori (7 pairs) and L. columna (8–16 pairs).
Japan
Date
action
by
Lamellibrachia sagami Kobayashi, Miura & Kojima, 2015 accepted as Lamellibrachia columna Southward, 1991 (original description)
Holotype NSMT NSMT-Pol H-593, geounit Sagami Bay, identified as Lamellibrachia sagami Kobayashi, Miura & Kojima, 2015
Additional information
Lamellibrachia sagami previously informally known in ecological records as Lamellibrachia sp. L1 by Kojima et al., ... [details]
Etymology
Authors: "specific epithet sagami, as noun in apposition, refers to the province name of the Edo period for ... [details]
Status
Lamellibrachia victori is currently questionably distinct from L. luymesi van der Land & Norrevang, 1975 [details]
Type locality
Off Hatsushima in Sagami Bay, Japan, 35.0158, 139.222, 853 m [The holotype latitude is incorrectly given as 39.0158 ... [details]