WoRMS name details

Brachyphallinae Skrjabin & Guschanskaja, 1955

1368644  (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:1368644)

 unaccepted (synonym)
Subfamily
marine
Skrjabin, K. I., Guschanskaja, L. K. (1955). Suborder Hemiurata (Markevitsch) Skrjabin & Guschanskaja, 1954. Second part. <em>Osnovy Trematodologii.</em> 10: 337–649. (In Russian).
page(s): 467 [details]   
Taxonomic remark We are in favour of resurrecting the Brachyphallinae, for Brachyphallus and Dinosoma at least, as per the phylogenetic...  
Taxonomic remark We are in favour of resurrecting the Brachyphallinae, for Brachyphallus and Dinosoma at least, as per the phylogenetic analyses. However, adequately distinguishing this concept from the Lecithochiriinae and Plerurinae, and determining its composition requires further
investigation beyond the scope of this manuscript. [details]
WoRMS (2024). Brachyphallinae Skrjabin & Guschanskaja, 1955. Accessed at: https://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=1368644 on 2024-02-29
Date
action
by
2019-08-16 08:05:50Z
created
2019-10-16 07:47:51Z
changed

Creative Commons License The webpage text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License


original description Skrjabin, K. I., Guschanskaja, L. K. (1955). Suborder Hemiurata (Markevitsch) Skrjabin & Guschanskaja, 1954. Second part. <em>Osnovy Trematodologii.</em> 10: 337–649. (In Russian).
page(s): 467 [details]   

status source Martin, S. B.; De Silva, M.; Pathirana, E.; Rajapakse, R. (2023). Polyphyly of the Dinurinae Looss, 1907 (Digenea: Hemiuridae) and resurrection of the Mecoderinae Skrjabin & Guschanskaja, 1954 based on novel collection of Tubulovesicula laticaudi Parukhin, 1969 from marine elapid snakes in Sri Lanka. <em>Parasitology International.</em> 97: 102776., available online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parint.2023.102776 [details]   
From editor or global species database
Taxonomic remark We are in favour of resurrecting the Brachyphallinae, for Brachyphallus and Dinosoma at least, as per the phylogenetic analyses. However, adequately distinguishing this concept from the Lecithochiriinae and Plerurinae, and determining its composition requires further
investigation beyond the scope of this manuscript. [details]