WoRMS taxon details
Galeolaria Lamarck, 1818
325109 (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:325109)
accepted
Genus
Galeolaria caespitosa Lamarck, 1818 (type by subsequent designation)
Galeoloria · unaccepted (lapsus calami)
Vermilia (Galeolaria) Lamarck, 1818 · unaccepted
- Species Galeolaria caespitosa Lamarck, 1818
- Species Galeolaria gemineoa Halt, Kupriyanova, Cooper & Rouse, 2009
- Species Galeolaria hystrix Mörch, 1863
- Species Galeolaria cespitosa [auct. lapsus] accepted as Galeolaria caespitosa Lamarck, 1818 (misspelling of 'caespitosa')
- Species Galeolaria decubens [auct. lapsus] accepted as Galeolaria caespitosa Lamarck, 1818 (misspelling of 'decumbens')
- Species Galeolaria decumbens Sowerby & Sowerby, 1820-25 accepted as Galeolaria caespitosa Lamarck, 1818 (subjective synonym)
- Species Galeolaria elongata Lamarck, 1818 accepted as Galeolaria caespitosa Lamarck, 1818 (subjective synonym)
- Species Galeolaria rosea Valenciennes in Quatrefages, 1866 accepted as Galeolaria hystrix Mörch, 1863 (subjective synonym)
- Species Galeolaria tetracerus (Schmarda, 1861) accepted as Spirobranchus tetraceros (Schmarda, 1861) (superseded recombination)
marine, brackish, fresh, terrestrial
recent + fossil
Lamarck, J.B. (1818). [volume 5 of] Histoire naturelle des Animaux sans Vertèbres, préséntant les caractères généraux et particuliers de ces animaux, leur distribution, leurs classes, leurs familles, leurs genres, et la citation des principales espèces qui s'y rapportent; precedes d'une Introduction offrant la determination des caracteres essentiels de l'Animal, sa distinction du vegetal et desautres corps naturels, enfin, l'Exposition des Principes fondamentaux de la Zoologie. <em>Paris, Deterville.</em> vol 5: 612 pp., available online at http://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/12886879
page(s): 371; note: based on specimens from Nouvelle Hollande (Australia) [details]
page(s): 371; note: based on specimens from Nouvelle Hollande (Australia) [details]
Homonymy Galeolaria Lamarck, 1818 is the senior homonym of Galeolaria Blainville, 1830 in Cnidaria: Hydrozoa: Siphonophorae, a thus...
Homonymy Galeolaria Lamarck, 1818 is the senior homonym of Galeolaria Blainville, 1830 in Cnidaria: Hydrozoa: Siphonophorae, a thus invalid name replaced by Galeta Stechow, 1921, in turn regarded as a junior synonym of Sulculeolaria Blainville, 1830. The Cnidaria names originally placed under the cnidarian Galeolaria genus are thus recombined into Sulculeolaria. Note that Galeolaria filiformis (Forsskål, 1775), originally Physsophora filiformis Forsskål, 1775 is a senior secondary homonym to Galeolaria filiformis (J. de C. Sowerby, 1836), originally Serpula filiformis.
Note that Dew (1959:37) has a comment on the siphonophore taxon Galeolaria australis (in the context of Galeolaria the serpulid polychaete genus name). This comment might be open to misinterpretation. It was not a case of a cnidarian initially misidentified as a polychaete, rather the two genera names were simply accidental homonyms.
[details]
Note that Dew (1959:37) has a comment on the siphonophore taxon Galeolaria australis (in the context of Galeolaria the serpulid polychaete genus name). This comment might be open to misinterpretation. It was not a case of a cnidarian initially misidentified as a polychaete, rather the two genera names were simply accidental homonyms.
[details]
Read, G.; Fauchald, K. (Ed.) (2024). World Polychaeta Database. Galeolaria Lamarck, 1818. Accessed through: World Register of Marine Species at: https://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=325109 on 2024-09-20
Date
action
by
The webpage text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License
original description
Lamarck, J.B. (1818). [volume 5 of] Histoire naturelle des Animaux sans Vertèbres, préséntant les caractères généraux et particuliers de ces animaux, leur distribution, leurs classes, leurs familles, leurs genres, et la citation des principales espèces qui s'y rapportent; precedes d'une Introduction offrant la determination des caracteres essentiels de l'Animal, sa distinction du vegetal et desautres corps naturels, enfin, l'Exposition des Principes fondamentaux de la Zoologie. <em>Paris, Deterville.</em> vol 5: 612 pp., available online at http://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/12886879
page(s): 371; note: based on specimens from Nouvelle Hollande (Australia) [details]
additional source Hove, Harry A. ten.; Kupriyanova, Elena K. (2009). Taxonomy of Serpulidae (Annelida, Polychaeta): The state of affairs. <em>Zootaxa.</em> 2036: 1-126., available online at http://www.mapress.com/j/zt/issue/view/2173
page(s): 49 [details]
page(s): 371; note: based on specimens from Nouvelle Hollande (Australia) [details]
additional source Hove, Harry A. ten.; Kupriyanova, Elena K. (2009). Taxonomy of Serpulidae (Annelida, Polychaeta): The state of affairs. <em>Zootaxa.</em> 2036: 1-126., available online at http://www.mapress.com/j/zt/issue/view/2173
page(s): 49 [details]
From editor or global species database
Authority Hartman catalogue credits Savigny with the authorship of Galeolaria but this appears baseless. The taxa came to the Paris museum from Australia, not the Red Sea, and a footnote in Savigny's 1822 Egypt monograph credits the authorship to Lamarck. [details]Homonymy Galeolaria Lamarck, 1818 is the senior homonym of Galeolaria Blainville, 1830 in Cnidaria: Hydrozoa: Siphonophorae, a thus invalid name replaced by Galeta Stechow, 1921, in turn regarded as a junior synonym of Sulculeolaria Blainville, 1830. The Cnidaria names originally placed under the cnidarian Galeolaria genus are thus recombined into Sulculeolaria. Note that Galeolaria filiformis (Forsskål, 1775), originally Physsophora filiformis Forsskål, 1775 is a senior secondary homonym to Galeolaria filiformis (J. de C. Sowerby, 1836), originally Serpula filiformis.
Note that Dew (1959:37) has a comment on the siphonophore taxon Galeolaria australis (in the context of Galeolaria the serpulid polychaete genus name). This comment might be open to misinterpretation. It was not a case of a cnidarian initially misidentified as a polychaete, rather the two genera names were simply accidental homonyms.
[details]