Polychaeta name details

Spirorbis pervius (Montagu, 1803)

331253  (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:331253)

uncertain > taxon inquirendum
Species
marine, brackish, fresh, terrestrial
recent only
Not documented
Taxonomy Originally named by Montagu (1803: 518-519), based on a figure by G. Walker (1784, pl.1 fig.12), which depicts a fairly...  
Taxonomy Originally named by Montagu (1803: 518-519), based on a figure by G. Walker (1784, pl.1 fig.12), which depicts a fairly non-descript minute straight shell with a small spiralised beginning, which was thought to be a Caecum by Mörch (1863: 464) [details]
Read, G.; Fauchald, K. (Ed.) (2021). World Polychaeta Database. Spirorbis pervius (Montagu, 1803). Accessed at: http://www.marinespecies.org/polychaeta/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=331253 on 2025-06-01
Date
action
by
2008-03-17 10:44:16Z
created
2008-03-26 11:36:43Z
changed
2010-04-23 20:12:30Z
changed

basis of record Hartman, Olga. (1959). Catalogue of the Polychaetous Annelids of the World. Parts 1 and 2. <em>Allan Hancock Foundation Occasional Paper.</em> 23: 1-628. [details] Available for editors  PDF available [request]

additional source Mörch [Mørch], O. A. L. (1863). Revisio critica Serpulidarum. Et Bidrag til Rørormenes Naturhistorie. <em>Naturhistorisk Tidsskrift København.</em> Ser. 3, 1: 347-470, pl. 11 [also issued as a separate, 1–124, pl. 11]., available online at http://www.archive.org/details/naturhistoriskti01copeuoft
page(s): 464 [details] 

additional source Fleming J. 1825. On the British testaceous annelids. <i>The Edinburgh Philosophical Journal</i>, 12(24): 238-248., available online at http://www.archive.org/stream/edinburghphilos02edingoog#page/n255/mode/2up [details] 
From editor or global species database
Original Combination Vermiculum pervium,
Vermiculum Montagu, 1803
 [details]

Taxonomy Originally named by Montagu (1803: 518-519), based on a figure by G. Walker (1784, pl.1 fig.12), which depicts a fairly non-descript minute straight shell with a small spiralised beginning, which was thought to be a Caecum by Mörch (1863: 464) [details]