WoRMS name details
Pleurotoma ginnanianum R. A. Philippi, 1844
875512 (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:875512)
unaccepted
Species
Pleurotoma Lamarck, 1799 accepted as Turris Batsch, 1789
marine
Philippi, R. A. (1844). <i>Enumeratio molluscorum Siciliae cum viventium tum in tellure tertiaria fossilium, quae in itinere suo observavit. Vol. 2.</i>. Halle [Halis Saxorum]: Eduard Anton. iv + 303 pp., pls 13-28., available online at https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/46936062
page(s): 168, pl. 26 fig. 6; vol. 1 (1836) pl. 11 fig. 20 as Pleurotoma bertrandi; note: see nomenclatural note below [details]
page(s): 168, pl. 26 fig. 6; vol. 1 (1836) pl. 11 fig. 20 as Pleurotoma bertrandi; note: see nomenclatural note below [details]
MolluscaBase eds. (2024). MolluscaBase. Pleurotoma ginnanianum R. A. Philippi, 1844. Accessed through: World Register of Marine Species at: https://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=875512 on 2024-08-31
The webpage text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License
original description
Philippi, R. A. (1844). <i>Enumeratio molluscorum Siciliae cum viventium tum in tellure tertiaria fossilium, quae in itinere suo observavit. Vol. 2.</i>. Halle [Halis Saxorum]: Eduard Anton. iv + 303 pp., pls 13-28., available online at https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/46936062
page(s): 168, pl. 26 fig. 6; vol. 1 (1836) pl. 11 fig. 20 as Pleurotoma bertrandi; note: see nomenclatural note below [details]
page(s): 168, pl. 26 fig. 6; vol. 1 (1836) pl. 11 fig. 20 as Pleurotoma bertrandi; note: see nomenclatural note below [details]
From editor or global species database
Authority Philippi (1844: 168) described this species attributing the name to Scacchi, 1836 (Catalogus Conchyliorum regni Neapolitani, p. 13). However Scacchi only listed Pleurotoma ginnania (Risso, 1826), without giving a description and clearly stating Risso as the authority. Philippi changed the name, provided a figure and a description, and stated differences with Mangelia ginnania Risso, 1826, so that he is assumed to have described a new taxon [details]