WoRMS name details
Boeckia nasuta G.O. Sars, 1894
873585 (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:873585)
unaccepted (nomen dubium)
Species
Boeckia G.O. Sars, 1894 accepted as Axelboeckia Stebbing, 1899
recent only
Not documented
Horton, T.; Lowry, J.; De Broyer, C.; Bellan-Santini, D.; Copilas-Ciocianu, D.; Corbari, L.; Costello, M.J.; Daneliya, M.; Dauvin, J.-C.; Fišer, C.; Gasca, R.; Grabowski, M.; Guerra-García, J.M.; Hendrycks, E.; Hughes, L.; Jaume, D.; Jazdzewski, K.; Kim, Y.-H.; King, R.; Krapp-Schickel, T.; LeCroy, S.; Lörz, A.-N.; Mamos, T.; Senna, A.R.; Serejo, C.; Souza-Filho, J.F.; Tandberg, A.H.; Thomas, J.D.; Thurston, M.; Vader, W.; Väinölä, R.; Valls Domedel, G.; Vonk, R.; White, K.; Zeidler, W. (2024). World Amphipoda Database. Boeckia nasuta G.O. Sars, 1894. Accessed through: World Register of Marine Species at: https://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=873585 on 2024-12-08
The webpage text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License
basis of record
Sars, G.O. (1894). Crustacea caspia. Contributions to the knowledge of the Carcinological Fauna of the Caspian Sea. Part III. Amphipoda. Gammarida. <em>Bulletin de l'Academie Imperiale des Sciences de St.-Petersbourg, (Ser. 5).</em> 1: 179-223, 343-378; 16 pls., available online at http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/25216479#page/9/mode/1up [details]
Present Present in aphia/obis/gbif/idigbio Inaccurate Introduced: alien Containing type locality
From editor or global species database
Habitat Epigean [details]Synonymy Besides the species described below [Boeckia spinosa], Dr. Grimm has distinguished 2 otlier species of this genus under the names B. nasuta and B. hystrix. Both these species are, however, founded upon quite immature specimens, the first-named agreeing exactly with young specimens of B. spinosa, as figured PI. II, fig. 10; and the other only differing in the dorsal prominences of the segments being somewhat stronger and elevated to acutely triangular projections. In my opinion both these supposed species ought to be withdrawn, the genus being at present only represented by a single species. [details]
