WoRMS name details

Spirastrella purpurea concrescens Vosmaer, 1911

1610379  (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:1610379)

 unaccepted (unavailable name)
Subspecies
marine, brackish, fresh, terrestrial
recent only
Vosmaer, G.C.J. (1911). The Porifera of the <i>Siboga</i>-expedition: 2. The genus <i>Spirastrella</i>. <i><i>Siboga</i>-Expeditie: uitkomsten op zoölogisch, botanisch, oceanographisch en geologisch gebied verzameld in Nederlandsch Oost-Indië 1899-1900 aan boord H.M. <i>Siboga</i> onder commando van Luitenant ter Zee 1e kl. G.F. Tydeman</i>, VIa(1). E.J. Brill: Leyden, The Netherlands. 69, plates I-XIV pp. (look up in IMIS)
page(s): 26 [details]  OpenAccess publication 
Taxonomy Vosmaer (1911, pp. 26-27) describing and discussing the Spirastrella specimens collected by the Siboga Expedition took it...  
Taxonomy Vosmaer (1911, pp. 26-27) describing and discussing the Spirastrella specimens collected by the Siboga Expedition took it upon himself to revise all species assigned to Spirastrella known at the time. He arrived at an unprecedented conclusion that about 30 species, from all parts of the world oceans, in his opinion belonged to a single species Spirastrella pupurea (Lamarck, 1815 as Alcyonium) (currently Spheciospongia purpurea). He acknowledged the variability of this 'species' by erecting 7 tropi (single term: tropus), an infraspecific taxonomic unit that is not recognized by current rules of the ICZN (cf. art. 45.6). The Aphia database has no taxon category 'tropus', so we can only use a trinomen at the level of 'subspecies' to catalogue these taxa). Vosmaer expressly refuted the use of 'variety' or 'forma' for his tropi. Moreover, these tropus names are also junior synonyms of the eldest names of the species assigned to the tropi by Vosmaer, Since the ICZN does not recognize tropi, the names of Vosmaer are unavailable and we will list them only for completeness sake. [details]
de Voogd, N.J.; Alvarez, B.; Boury-Esnault, N.; Cárdenas, P.; Díaz, M.-C.; Dohrmann, M.; Downey, R.; Goodwin, C.; Hajdu, E.; Hooper, J.N.A.; Kelly, M.; Klautau, M.; Lim, S.C.; Manconi, R.; Morrow, C.; Pinheiro, U.; Pisera, A.B.; Ríos, P.; Rützler, K.; Schönberg, C.; Turner, T.; Vacelet, J.; van Soest, R.W.M.; Xavier, J. (2024). World Porifera Database. Spirastrella purpurea concrescens Vosmaer, 1911. Accessed through: World Register of Marine Species at: https://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=1610379 on 2024-04-30
Date
action
by
2022-11-12 15:44:26Z
created

Creative Commons License The webpage text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License


original description Vosmaer, G.C.J. (1911). The Porifera of the <i>Siboga</i>-expedition: 2. The genus <i>Spirastrella</i>. <i><i>Siboga</i>-Expeditie: uitkomsten op zoölogisch, botanisch, oceanographisch en geologisch gebied verzameld in Nederlandsch Oost-Indië 1899-1900 aan boord H.M. <i>Siboga</i> onder commando van Luitenant ter Zee 1e kl. G.F. Tydeman</i>, VIa(1). E.J. Brill: Leyden, The Netherlands. 69, plates I-XIV pp. (look up in IMIS)
page(s): 26 [details]  OpenAccess publication 
From editor or global species database
Synonymy The tropus 'concrescens' was assigned a single taxon by Vosmaer (1911: 26), Vioa florida Lendenfeld, 1897,This name should replace the name 'concrescens' as it is older. We link the present taxon name to Spheciospongia florida, but the name 'tubulifera' is unavailable. [details]

Taxonomy Vosmaer (1911, pp. 26-27) describing and discussing the Spirastrella specimens collected by the Siboga Expedition took it upon himself to revise all species assigned to Spirastrella known at the time. He arrived at an unprecedented conclusion that about 30 species, from all parts of the world oceans, in his opinion belonged to a single species Spirastrella pupurea (Lamarck, 1815 as Alcyonium) (currently Spheciospongia purpurea). He acknowledged the variability of this 'species' by erecting 7 tropi (single term: tropus), an infraspecific taxonomic unit that is not recognized by current rules of the ICZN (cf. art. 45.6). The Aphia database has no taxon category 'tropus', so we can only use a trinomen at the level of 'subspecies' to catalogue these taxa). Vosmaer expressly refuted the use of 'variety' or 'forma' for his tropi. Moreover, these tropus names are also junior synonyms of the eldest names of the species assigned to the tropi by Vosmaer, Since the ICZN does not recognize tropi, the names of Vosmaer are unavailable and we will list them only for completeness sake. [details]