Integrated Marine Information System (IMIS)

Data Policy
Persons | Institutes | Publications | Projects | Datasets
[ report an error in this record ]basket (1): add | show Print this page

one publication added to basket [233610]
Vegetative and reproductive phenological traits of Rhizophora mucronata Lamk. and Sonneratia alba Sm.
Wang’ondu, V.W.; Kairo, J.G.; Kinyamario, J.I.; Mwaura, F.B.; Bosire, J.O.; Dahdouh-Guebas, F.; Koedam, N. (2013). Vegetative and reproductive phenological traits of Rhizophora mucronata Lamk. and Sonneratia alba Sm. Flora (Jena) 208(8-9): 522–531. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.flora.2013.08.004
In: Flora (Jena). Elsevier: München. ISSN 0367-2530; e-ISSN 1618-0585
Peer reviewed article  

Available in  Authors 

Author keywords
    Buds; Flowering; Leaf development; Propagules; Mangrove; Kenya

Authors  Top 
  • Wang’ondu, V.W.
  • Kairo, J.G.
  • Kinyamario, J.I.
  • Mwaura, F.B.
  • Bosire, J.O.
  • Dahdouh-Guebas, F., more
  • Koedam, N.

Abstract
    Mangrove phenology is important in understanding the past, present and future response of mangrove species to impacts of climate change. Our study is the first long term direct observation of the phenology of Rhizophora mucronata and Sonneratia alba in Kenya. Objective of the study was to determine, interpret and document the timing of the various phenoevents and phenophases, and to establish relationships between phenology and the climatic variables. Phenological traits were investigated in six monospecific mangrove stands in Gazi Bay, south of Mombasa, for 2 years. Leaf emergence, leaf fall, flower bud, flower and fruit initiation data were recorded every fortnight in 54 shoots of 9 trees at each site. Continuous leaf emergence and loss characterized by multimodal peaks was observed for the two species. Leaf emergence and leaf fall peaked in the wet months and was reduced in the dry months. There was a relationship between the leaf emergence and drop with the reproductive phenology in the two species. Mean leaf longevity for R. mucronata and S. alba was 12.8 ± 1.2 and 4.9 ± 0.5 months respectively. The reproductive cycle took approximately 16–20 months in R. mucronata and 4–5 months in S. alba. Bud initiation in R. mucronata was seasonal and occurred in October and September. Buds were observed for 8–11 months developing slowly on the shoots. Shifts were observed in the timing of flower initiation, and the flowering period lasted in total for 4–5 months. The time period from flower appearance to the developmental start of immature propagules lasted about 1 month at reforested sites and up to 5 months in stands of natural vegetation. In R. mucronata initiation of immature propagules was not seasonal and varied among the sites. Fruiting in S. alba was short and seasonal without overlap, and shifts were observed in the timing of flowering, flowering and fruiting peaks. Abscission of reproductive parts started in July and in June, respectively, in the years 2005 and 2006. Fruiting was observed starting in August in both years, and fruiting peak was reached in October in 2005 and one month earlier in 2006. In R. mucronata vegetative and reproductive phenophases significantly correlated with climatic variables, whereas in S. alba only leaf emergence and leaf fall correlated with temperature. The flowering plasticity in the reproductive phenology of the two species indicates possible sensitivity to certain climatic and environmental triggers. Our results also indicate that R. mucronata trees have a distinctly higher investment in the reproductive cycle than S. alba.

All data in the Integrated Marine Information System (IMIS) is subject to the VLIZ privacy policy Top | Authors 
[Back]