Assessing coastal benthic macrofauna community condition using best professional judgement – Developing consensus across North America and Europe

Teixeira, H.; Borja, A.; Weisberg, S.B.; Ranasinghe, J.A.; Cadien, D.B.; Dauer, D.M.; Dauvin, J.-C.; Degraer, S.; Diaz, R.J.; Grémare, A.; Karakassis, I.; Llansó, R.J.; Lovell, L.L.; Marques, J.C.; Montagne, D.E.; Occhipinti-Ambrogi, A.; Rosenberg, R.; Sardá, R.; Schaffner, L.C.; Velarde, R.G.

doi:/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2009.11.005

Integrated Marine Information System (IMIS)

Data Policy

Persons | Institutes | Publications | Projects | Datasets

[ report an error in this record ]

basket (0): add | show

Assessing coastal benthic macrofauna community condition using best professional judgement – Developing consensus across North America and Europe

Teixeira, H.; Borja, A.; Weisberg, S.B.; Ranasinghe, J.A.; Cadien, D.B.; Dauer, D.M.; Dauvin, J.-C.; Degraer, S.; Diaz, R.J.; Grémare, A.; Karakassis, I.; Llansó, R.J.; Lovell, L.L.; Marques, J.C.; Montagne, D.E.; Occhipinti-Ambrogi, A.; Rosenberg, R.; Sardá, R.; Schaffner, L.C.; Velarde, R.G. (2010). Assessing coastal benthic macrofauna community condition using best professional judgement – Developing consensus across North America and Europe. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 60(4): 589-600. dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2009.11.005

In: Marine Pollution Bulletin. Macmillan: London. ISSN 0025-326X; e-ISSN 1879-3363

Available in	Authors
VLIZ: Open Marine Archive 212371 [ download pdf ]

Keywords

Aquatic communities > Benthos
Disturbance (ecosystem)
Europe Coasts
Geography
Habitat
Scaling
USA Coasts

Author keywords

Best professional judgment; Coastal benthic macrofauna; Anthropogenic disturbance; Quality assessment; North America; Europe

Authors		Top
Teixeira, H. Borja, A. Weisberg, S.B. Ranasinghe, J.A. Cadien, D.B. Dauer, D.M. Dauvin, J.-C., more	Degraer, S., more Diaz, R.J. Grémare, A. Karakassis, I. Llansó, R.J. Lovell, L.L. Marques, J.C.	Montagne, D.E. Occhipinti-Ambrogi, A. Rosenberg, R. Sardá, R. Schaffner, L.C. Velarde, R.G.

Abstract

Benthic indices are typically developed independently by habitat, making their incorporation into large geographic scale assessments potentially problematic because of scaling inequities. A potential solution is to establish common scaling using expert best professional judgment (BPJ). To test if experts from different geographies agree on condition assessment, sixteen experts from four regions in USA and Europe were provided species-abundance data for twelve sites per region. They ranked samples from best to worst condition and classified samples into four condition (quality) categories. Site rankings were highly correlated among experts, regardless of whether they were assessing samples from their home region. There was also good agreement on condition category, though agreement was better for samples at extremes of the disturbance gradient. The absence of regional bias suggests that expert judgment is a viable means for establishing a uniform scale to calibrate indices consistently across geographic regions.

All data in the Integrated Marine Information System (IMIS) is subject to the VLIZ privacy policy

Top | Authors

[Back]

Integrated Marine Information System (IMIS)

WoRMS

Using WoRMS

Tools

Connect with us